June 14, 2026
Something From the Board
At the 2026 General Assembly, delegates will consider a proposed amendment to the UUA Bylaws regarding the authority of the Review Team to suspend or place a minister’s search on hold. Because this proposal has generated significant discussion among UUMA members and has implications for our shared ministry and professional community, the UUMA Board of Trustees has prepared the following statement.
The statement reflects conversations held during recent UUMA Board Dialogue Sessions, discussions at our Annual Meeting, and feedback received directly from members. An abbreviated version of these remarks will be shared during the General Assembly debate on Monday.
UUMA Statement on the 2026 GA Bylaw Amendment –
Authority to Suspend or Place a Minister’s Search on Hold
We are grateful for the conversation and attention to the Review Team and hold process that this bylaw amendment engendered. We are aware of the larger circumstances in which we are all trying to minister to meet this moment. We are here with you in the struggle for justice and equity in our own midst.
We understand the power we hold as ministers and the importance of systems of accountability. We acknowledge the communal and sometimes generational impact of misconduct. We also know that ministry is increasingly challenging and precarious. Furthermore, we know that the removal of the ability for fellowshipped ministers to practice ministry, on either a temporary or permanent basis, is a significant act, impacting our clergy, congregations, and whole denomination.
The current system giving the power for temporary “holds” to a Review Team composed of Unitarian Universalist Association staff poses real challenges in conflicts of interest, as well as in deeper ecclesial questions. In the current system there are issues of transparency, clarity, equity, consistency, and timely resolution. We are aware of a general lack of understanding, even among our UUMA members, of how this process functions. Many holds cause significant economic impact as some of our colleagues have lost a year or more of work in congregational ministry.
In recent years, the UUMA has advocated for changes within the Review Team. Some of these changes, including greater congregational accountability and education about the Review Team composition and organization have begun. In addition, the UUA Ministries and Faith Development Staff Group has begun working with the UUMA in order to provide UUMA representation on the Review Team. We applaud these changes, and yet acknowledge more data about the current Review Team process, as well as a comprehensive examination in light of our polity and theology is warranted.
We are concerned that the current Bylaw proposal, which moves the responsibilities for the hold process to the Ministerial Fellowship Committee will not substantially remedy the current problems nor address the theological questions before us as a faith. We do not support this bylaw change because, given the substantial workload already borne by the MFC as a volunteer committee, it is likely to further slow the process.
While we do not support this amendment, we acknowledge the challenges of, and harms caused by, the present system. We do believe a reshifting including bylaw amendments will be necessary to solve this problem, but do not agree this particular amendment is the solution. We support creating a collaborative and timely process to develop an effective, equitable, and just system that will serve our faith, protect our congregations, reduce harm, ensure ministers are held accountable for the competent exercise of our vocation, demand ministerial accountability in cases of misconduct, as well as making sure that congregations are also held accountable when members behave inappropriately to help prevent harm to all religious professionals.
Congregations as well as religious professionals, along with the UUA, Congregational Life Staff, our seminaries, and the MFC all have a responsibility in reducing the precarity of our ministerial profession and ensuring a robust network of care and development in cases where mistakes, but not misconduct, have occurred. Please oppose this Bylaw change and join us in advocating for a thorough, timely process in which all stakeholders–including the UUMA– can participate in solving the problems, reducing the harm, and aligning our processes with our theology and values.
|